Is being happy really that simple or are there other circumstances
that effect our well-being? This question is addressed in many different ways.
Scholars of all disciplines argue about this topic in both: nonscientific and mathematical
terms. They discuss various issues about happiness, such as why some people are
happier than others or what happy people have in common, how happiness is
created on individual level or why some countries are considered to be happier
places to live in.
While many researchers consider it impossible to measure happiness, as it is very subjective term, others have created different ways to capture aspects of happiness and provide its nature through exact numbers by measuring several different components. United Nation has even passed a United Nation’s Happiness Resolution in 2011 and there are plenty of reports available that define happiness index.
The World Happiness Report 2016 ranks 156 countries by their
happiness levels. The study is based on a survey data. Happiness score for each
country consists of different components such as: GDP per capita, Social
support, Healthy life expectancy, Freedom to make life choices, Generosity, Perceptions
of corruption and etc.
It is interesting to underline that Nordic countries rank
highest positions regarding to happiness level. Denmark, Iceland, Norway,
Finland and Sweden are among 10 happiest countries in the world. This fact
provides a not surprising evidence that richest countries are the happiest ones
as Scandinavian countries are widely considered as most wealthy nations. The
correlation between GDP and Happiness Index is very high. In a same time if we
look at correlation between Happiness Index and all other subjective
determinants of happiness (Social support, Healthy life expectancy, Freedom to
make life choices, Generosity, Perceptions of corruption, level of trust and etc.) excluding GDP, we will find even higher correlation between those two. Therefore, it can be concluded that money
matters, it makes people happier, but there are other things that may matter
more.
Why Nordics do so well? Partly because of Nordic welfare
model which by providing healthcare, equal opportunities, access to free
education, unemployment benefits and etc. creates possibility to reduce extreme
unhappiness. Additionally, factors such as personal freedom, trust towards both:
society and political institutions (Yes, maybe this is the reason they have
high taxation, because they trust they will get high return from government),
level of generosity and other factors that are highly correlated with happiness
are very high in Scandinavian nations.
With all these statistics, why are suicide rates still high
in Scandinavian countries when there are less extremely low happiness living
conditions compared to others? Well, maybe because it “hurts” more to be somewhere
down in a happy society. Happiness itself is a relative term. People do not
feel satisfied in a society where everyone is happy in a same way. Nobody likes
iPhone 4 while everyone else has iPhone 5.
Happiness Index might be a good measure of progress. Ranking of happiness index gives similar
picture every year, but If we look at changes in happiness scores from 2005-2007
to 2013-2015, we can find that less developed countries are also progressing.
Gross National Happiness is a term coined by His Majesty the
Fourth King of Bhutan in the 1970s. The concept implies
that sustainable development should take a holistic approach towards notions of
progress and give equal importance to non-economic aspects of wellbeing. If all
countries concentrate on happiness rather than just increase GDP per capita, this world might be a better place to live
in.
No comments:
Post a Comment